EVERYTHING WILL GET BETTER: I'LL BET ON IT Julian L. Simon People everywhere are living longer. The standard of living is rising throughout the world. Raw materials and energy are getting less scarce. The world's food supply is improving. Pollution in the U. S. has been decreasing. Population growth has long-term benefits, though added people are a burden in the short run. The U. S. benefits from more immigrants. These assertions have stood the test of time. Indeed, in the 1980s the professional consensus, including a recent report of the National Academy of Sciences, has come to agree. And I'll bet a week's or month's pay that any trend pertaining to human material welfare will improve rather than get worse. In contrast, the conventional beliefs of the doomsayers have been entirely falsified by events during the last two decades. Population growth and increase of income expand demand, forcing up prices of natural resources. The increased prices trigger the search for new supplies, and eventually new sources and substitutes are found. These discoveries leave humanity better off than if the shortages had not occurred. On balance, humans beings create more than they destroy. The structure of society determines the speed of development. With economic liberty, population growth causes fewer short-run problems, and greater long-run benefits, than where the state controls economic activity. **** Julian L. Simon is professor of business administration at the University of Maryland. His books on demography include The Economics of Population Growth; The Ultimate Resource; Theory of Population and Economic Growth; Effort, Opportunity and Wealth, The Economic Consequences of Immigration, and most recently, Population Matters: People, Resources, Environment, and Immigration. He has also written widely on other subjects, including research and statistical methods, the economics of advertising, and managerial economics. page 1 /article4 popabstr/February 14, 1994